Diamonds, Dispossession and Democracy in Botswana (African Issues) [Kenneth Good] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Is Botswana still. This book wipes the lustre off Africa’s sparkling success story, Botswana. Through the pages of a relatively slim volume, Australian Professor. Cambridge Core – Economics: General Interest – Diamonds, Dispossession and Democracy in Botswana – by Kenneth Good.
|Published (Last):||27 September 2015|
|PDF File Size:||15.94 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.39 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
He sees diversification as essential to reduce the dependency on diamonds. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. No eBook available Amazon. Botswanw major hallmark of such centralization has been the capacity of sitting presidents to select the next president of the country by appointing vice-presidents; such automatic succession to power has sidelined parliament and the public.
Diamonds, dispossession and democracy in Botswana
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Republic of South Africa.
Log In Sign Up. Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link. If you are interested at all in the fair trade of diamonds, then read this book!!!
It asserts that Botswana will have ddiamonds difficulty extracting itself from such a trap. However a duopoly of presidentialism and ruling party preponderance has stimulated Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.
Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. Is Botswana still ‘an African miracle’? Discover Prime Book Box for Kids. During his tenure at the University of Botswana, Good earned a reputation fispossession a critical, yet rigorous, scholar and despite his politics being to the left botsswana many of his students, he was widely respected as an academic and teacher.
Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources.
Diamonds, Dispossession and Democracy in Botswana: Kenneth Good: : Books
Yet this book is no polemical exercise. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. The past history of Civil War in Sierra Leone is usually singled out, but recent government abuses in Zimbabwe also face considerable scorn. After World War II Taiwan and South Korea both inherited a relatively productive economic infrastructure from Japanese colonial rule; Britain, by contrast, left behind a basket case: However, the book is not just critical, and Good concludes by offering positive suggestions on how Botswana can reform itself.
But, as Kenneth Good points out, there is a seamy side to this story. Similarly, chapter 3 narrates the political dominance of the BDP since independence and describes how its uninterrupted hegemony has allowed the executive presidency to centralize power and undermine democracy.
This is by far the most searing chapter in the book—and based on existing literature and news reports, as well as on the author’s own earlier work; indeed others ddiamonds noted the unnecessary and cruel treatment of the San people by government authorities and the ways in which they have become subjects in the land of their birth.
Here Good contends that Botswana’s three postcolonial presidents engineered a political structure that enabled them to usurp much of the powers of parliament and the judiciary, and that the dominant political party, Botswana Democratic Party BDPfacilitated this centralization of authority.
Diamonds, Dispossession and Democracy in Botswana. This is in stark contrast to the criminal and illicit practices in Angola, Sierra Leone and the DRC, which fuelled the global trade in blood diamonds.
We ask that all book note reviews are limited to a maximum of words per book. Good is no crude Afro-pessimist. He illustrates how diamond production has helped to foster a nation entirely dependent on diamonds for its revenue and Good highlights the ways in which this situation has both created and masked the inequalities in the country. Diamonds, Dispossession and Democracy in Botswana takes aims at what it calls “celebratory” literature by positing that Botswana is neither developmental nor democratic in material terms.
Why are the Khoisan confined to ‘a gulag of special settlements’?