Court in the Jayalalithaa disproportionate assets case and “restored in full” DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law. The Supreme Court verdict in the disproportionate assets case should The DVAC, thanks to former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa’s hostility, was. SC verdict accuses Jayalalithaa as a mastermind who misused her public Highlighting that the Jayalalithaa disporportionate assets case.

Author: Kazuru Akinosho
Country: Yemen
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 25 June 2017
Pages: 91
PDF File Size: 4.31 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.29 Mb
ISBN: 147-4-47827-253-8
Downloads: 26271
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dum

The governor of Tamil Nadu, K. February 6, CM-in-waiting Sasikala is one of the accused in the case, and a negative verdict could affect her run to power.

Views Read Edit View history. It had toned down Sudhakaran’s wedding expenses by over 50 per cent of what the prosecution had cited. It is public opinion that should assert itself now on. Trial court verdict restored. Jayalalithaa became the first Chief Assegs to lose her post due to being convicted while in office and the seventh MLA to lose office for that reason.

During Junethe Supreme Court ordered resumption of trial and dismissed the plea from Jayalalithaa seeking to abate the case. Also Read DA case verdict shows that the corrupt cannot escape from law, says Acharya. The Assts further pointed out a jkdgement of circumstances in the case that proved the existence of a conspiracy among the accused.

asssts The opposition party petitioned the court to take control of those assets but a judge who inspected them in January ordered their transfer to Bangalore. Krishnadas Rajagopal New DelhiFebruary 14, Further, the trial court had discounted the value of constructions by depreciating it by 20 per cent.

This is why increased digitisation of public documents is of absolute importance if we are to rein in rapacious public servants. While the trial court hearing the case had convicted Jayalalithaa and Sasikala, Karnataka High Court had acquitted the accused in Jayalalithaa passed away on December 5 last year.


Skip to main content. On one particular morning, she was arrested by the Crime Branch of the Criminal Investigation Department. Sasikala, Ilavarasi and Sudhakaran have to surrender before trial court forthwith. On 15 FebruaryThe Supreme court overheard the case and convicted all.

How the DA case verdict went against Sasikala: Read full judgment and operative parts here

To see your saved stories, click on link hightlighted in bold. Supreme Court granted bail to Jayalalithaa and the other three in The leader of Dravida Munnetra KazhagamM. Since A 1 Jayalalithaa has expired, the appeals against her stands abated. Sasikala, of hatching one criminal conspiracy after other at Poes Garden to launder the ill-gotten wealth of Jayalalithaa for purchasing huge properties in the names of “masked fronts.


The SC bench had also asked Karnataka to prove that the source of money was Jayalalithaa and asked the prosecution to show evidence to the extent that the source of money was illegal. He was accused of aiding the defendants. Retrieved — via HighBeam. Rosiah ordered operations to maintain law and order and, while the police said that the situation was under control, opposition parties complained of violence. The Times of India. SC issues notice to Jayalalithaa and others on plea by Anbazhagan seeking removal of prosecutor.

Bail plea was not accepted, and is postponed for six more days”. I am sorry to say that in recent years it is in these services that dishonesty and rapacity have gone up to despicable heights.

Judgement was delayed because Anbazhagan petitioned the Supreme Court against the appointment of Bhavani Singh as prosecutor. Prosecution launched in sessions court in Chennai against Jayalalithaa and three others for having assets ‘disproportionate’ to their known income. The Supreme Court is expected to pronounce within a week its judgment in the high-profile disproportionate assets case against former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa, who died last year.

Karunanidhiwrote to the President of India and the Prime Minister seeking restoration jatalalithaa peace. The apex court’s verdict brings end the chief ministerial ambitions of Jayalalithaa’s closest aide.


Acharya expresses his inability to continue as SPP. Sixthly, the manner in which money moved between various accounts suggested that it was being laundered with full knowledge, says the judgement.

Tell us what you didn’t like in the comments. Find this comment offensive? Unless erring senior officers are made an example of, we cannot ask their juniors to fall in line. Skip to main content. The institution of jayalzlithaa Special Prosecutor must be strengthened if we are to bring the guilty in high places to book.

Jayalalithaa, a mastermind who misused her public office, says SC verdict – The Hindu

asstes The asxets of abetment against Sasikala and her family members was also found to be proved, the Court said. I was only surprised that the calls were so few! I was deeply disappointed, and was worried that all my efforts had been wasted by the most irrational judicial order by the single Karnataka judge, with its strange arithmetic.

Such cash becomes the basis for largescale property being purchased where all negotiations were done at the house of A-1 Ms. The apex court will decide on Karnataka government’s pleas challenging the acquittal of the two leaders in the assets case. Restoring “in toto” the trial court’s September conviction of Sasikala, Ilavarasi and Sudhakaran, the court said the appeals against Caae stood abated with her death on December 5, SC issues notice to Jayalalithaa on appeal challenging her acquittal.

Subramanian Swamy, then Janata Party chief, files a case against Jayalalithaa alleging that during her tenure as Tamil Nadu Chief Minister from toshe amassed properties worth Rs

Last modified: December 28, 2019